<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>that's my stapler &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thatsmystapler.org/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thatsmystapler.org</link>
	<description>Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:34:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>the needs of the one</title>
		<link>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2008/06/26/the-needs-of-the-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2008/06/26/the-needs-of-the-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatsmystapler.org/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Madcoder rants about the untrusted SSL certificate handling in Firefox 3, and suggests this regarding his own preferred implementation: It&#8217;s enough for 99.9% of the users. Isn&#8217;t that exactly the kind of uninformed pronouncement that gets us a lot of bad user interface design in the first place?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl" target="_blank">Madcoder</a> rants about the untrusted SSL certificate handling in Firefox 3, and suggests this regarding his own preferred implementation:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s enough for 99.9% of the users.</p></blockquote>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that exactly the kind of uninformed pronouncement that gets us a lot of bad user interface design in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2008/06/26/the-needs-of-the-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>urss considered harmful</title>
		<link>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2005/10/02/urss-considered-harmful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2005/10/02/urss-considered-harmful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shade</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[considered harmful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatsmystapler.org/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[urss is a Mozilla / Firefox extension that provides a side-scrolling ticker of your RSS feed(s). Sounds nifty, and it was exactly what I was looking for at the time I first installed it. However, after I tired of it (and discovered Sage) I looked for a way to uninstall. Oh boy. urss doesn&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>urss is a <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla / Firefox</a> extension that provides a side-scrolling ticker of your RSS feed(s).  Sounds nifty, and it was exactly what I was looking for at the time I first installed it.  However, after I tired of it (and discovered <a href="http://sage.mozdev.org/">Sage</a>) I looked for a way to uninstall.  Oh boy.</p>
<p>urss doesn&#8217;t have an &#8220;uninstall feature,&#8221; that being listed as something that&#8217;s in development.  That&#8217;s cool, because Firefox has an extension manager; no problem, right?  Wrong.  urss installs itself in <code>~/.mozilla/firefox/[profile name]/chrome/urss</code> where it has no need to be.  After thoroughly munging my existing profile trying to be rid of this thing and get Firefox to start properly, I finally started over with a new profile.  </p>
<p>All this is well and good, it&#8217;s a version 0.x product and all.  Except that there are no bugs filed against it.  Hm.  I went to try and file a bug.  Interesting, there&#8217;s <em>no bug tracker</em> for this obviously broken extension!  Stay away from urss unless you&#8217;re interested in testing and fixing it yourself.  You have been warned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatsmystapler.org/2005/10/02/urss-considered-harmful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
